← Search

Candice Nash

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jefferson, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 61W–26L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history87 matches
W
2026-10-23 · TOB/Chambers 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Lai
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-10-09 · TOB/Chambers 40+ 3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Fife
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-02 · TOB/Chambers 40+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · TOB/Chambers 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Fife
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-04 · TOB/Chambers 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Murphy
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-20 · Traditions of Braselton/Chambers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Lai
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · Traditions of Braselton/Chambers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Murphy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-06 · Traditions of Braselton/Chambers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Murphy
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-30 · Traditions of Braselton/Chambers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Lai
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-6
L
2026-01-08 · Cherokee Bluff (Vanessa Bradley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Fife
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-21 · TOB/Kimbrell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Shay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-1
L
2025-11-16 · TOB/Kimbrell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andy Nash mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.4% of games
3.0
75%
30W–10L · 56.4% of games
3.5
74.3%
26W–9L · 58.5% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 23% of the time
#4 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
20%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal