← Search

Lori Guariento

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 137W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history214 matches
W
2026-08-30 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Vella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Vella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Vella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlo Guariento mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Campbell
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miwon Vella
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Schofield
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Chamberlin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miwon Vella
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Ravanello
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Kemp
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0B · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Kemp
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 61% of games
3.5
53.8%
42W–36L · 51.5% of games
6.0
100%
8W–0L · 72.1% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.4% of games
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
59.7%
37W–25L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
97 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe