← Search

Karen Nead

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsford, NY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 2W–10L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history12 matches
L
Lauren Elker / Jamie Feingold
2026-08-24 · TCR: Ortiz · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rita Johnson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · TCR: Ortiz · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Roseann McGee
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · TCR: Ortiz · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rita Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-17 · Love-Love Ladies · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-11 · Rochester Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Gershenfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-11 · Rochester Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Goldsmith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
Beth Siebert / Julie Odenbach
2024-06-21 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Vander Horst
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-13 · Rochester Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Goldsmith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
Kathleen Spellane / Elizabeth Johnson
2024-06-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Vander Horst
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2020-02-09 · Varon · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martine Haralambides
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2020-01-19 · Varon · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lin Sun
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2019-12-15 · Varon · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Alfieri
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 25.9% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
17%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match
#1 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King