Mikaela Nagler
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Studio City, CA
499 matches · 195W–304L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history499 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams139 teams · 2019–2026
Aged to Perfection/Perryman/MHCC
Arroyo Vista Match Makers WE
Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC
Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC
Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC
Get a grip
Get a grip
Get a grip
LA - Lobcats
LA - Lobcats
LA - T-Birds
LA - T-Birds
LA - T-Birds
Mission Oaks Smart Aces
Mission Oaks Smart Aces
Servivors/Nagler/VNSO
Smash & Dash/Lula/CSUN
Smash&Dash/Lula/CSUN
Team Corbin/Corbin-Carmichael/MHCC
Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC
Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC
Team Corbin/Corbin/MHCC
The Servivors/Nagler/VNSO
Tri-Me/Bourne/MHCC
V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.6%
30W–23L · 52.4% of games
4.0
35.3%
127W–233L · 43.6% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 40.1% of games
8.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.1% of games
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 63.9% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 51.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
153 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
130 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
117 matches
#1 Singles
16%
79 matches
#2 Singles
2%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
9 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.