← Search

Michel Kulcsar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 94W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history137 matches
W
Default
2026-05-23 · Jorge Reset 2024 at JCC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-04-18 · Jorge Reset 2024 at JCC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manuel Lopez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2025-12-06 · Rodriguez (Alper JCC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2025-11-15 · Rodriguez (Alper JCC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2025-11-01 · Rodriguez (Alper JCC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-12 · Crandon Warriors · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Felipe Torres
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-20 · Warriors · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gianfranco Carames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-27 · Miami-Dade/Crandon Warriors/18&over8.5M · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gregory Joseph
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Juan Romero / Andres Perez
2023-06-06 · Miami-Dade/Crandon Warriors/18&over8.5M · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alejandro Gonzalez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2023-03-09 · TORRES CRANDON · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jose Porto
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-04 · Rapaport (Alper JCC) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ivan Vigo
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-03-02 · TORRES CRANDON · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felipe Torres
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games
4.0
76.4%
81W–25L · 62.4% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.7% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova