← Search

John Hedstrom

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Decorah, IA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
47 matches · 21W–26L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Richard Leake-Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Leake
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-10 · Richard Leake-Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Dickson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-09 · Richard Leake-Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Carlyle
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · Sichterman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Williams
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-18 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-07 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-01 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-11 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-10 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-10-10 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Cahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.1% of games
8.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer