← Search

Richard Hausman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waterville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 162W–102L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history264 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Dunlavy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vincent Halliday
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joey Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5M Combo Howard/Langenderfer-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Dunlavy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · NWO 40&Over 8.0MX Bloomquist · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kendra Spears mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX Keating/Bastas -Twos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Selin Bastas mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike O'Reilly
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Smith
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Cameron
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike O'Reilly
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike O'Reilly
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike O'Reilly
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 60.3% of games
3.5
69%
40W–18L · 59.4% of games
4.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 51% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
68.3%
28W–13L · 57.5% of games
7.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
20W–4L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.8%
26W–19L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#2 Singles
10%
27 matches
#1 Singles
6%
16 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King