← Search

Andrew Tisdale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hoover, AL
— year-end
42 matches · 27W–15L · seasons 2021–2023
Match history42 matches
L
2023-04-23 · Hoover Met - Julaka/Jumayeva · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Tisdale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-11-16 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-11-14 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-11-07 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-10-30 · Hoover Met - Strickland/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Tisdale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-10-24 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-10-16 · Hoover Met - Strickland/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Tisdale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-09-26 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-09-19 · Hoover Met - McCarty/Brasfield · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-08-17 · HMC - Brasfield - 2022 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chase Brasfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-08-16 · HMC - Brasfield - 2022 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chase Brasfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-08-03 · HMC - Brasfield - 2022 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pete Kozlowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Teams12 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.2% of games
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 63.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#2 Singles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Singles
17%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert