← Search

Tom Cramer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glendale, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
352 matches · 178W–174L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history352 matches
L
2026-11-02 · 3.5 ARR1 Cramer/Thomas M40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-29 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rohan Thomas
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-26 · 3.5 ARR1 Cramer/Thomas M40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-22 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · 3.5 PTC8 Fellowship M55F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lawrence Simon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-15 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike DiFabbio
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · 3.5 PTC8 Fellowship M55F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-24 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rohan Thomas
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-21 · 3.5 ARR1 Cramer/Thomas M40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim O'Connell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-10 · 3.5 ARR1 DiFabbio/Cramer M18F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Tomaras
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · 3.5 ARR1 Cramer/Thomas M40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Fehling
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.5
50.8%
153W–148L · 50.5% of games
4.0
15.8%
3W–16L · 35.5% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 49% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
230 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
42 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King