← Search

Kristen Ford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boulder, CO
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 68W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-25 · BCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · BCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · BCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · BCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · BCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachael Sparks
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-19 · BCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · BCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · BCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cat Diehl
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · BCC TEAL · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · BCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigette Paige
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-11 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Harrison mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-04 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Gottlieb mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
91.5%
43W–4L · 69.5% of games
4.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 63% of games
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 44.6% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#1 Singles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal