← Search

Rosemary Skoog

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
401 matches · 239W–162L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history401 matches
W
2026-10-21 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Wimmer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-19 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenette Swisher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · Diamonti/LHCC/Fhills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Hunt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-17 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marianna Geyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-15 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-14 · Skoog/LHCC/FHills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Deal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-12 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Szalanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Graham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-28 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Tate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-27 · Diamonti/LHCC/Fhills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Szalanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-22 · Diamonti/LHCC/Fhills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Szalanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Diamonti championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 58.9% of games
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.5% of games
3.0
71.4%
30W–12L · 57.7% of games
3.5
59.9%
94W–63L · 53.7% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 39.1% of games
5.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.8% of games
6.5
58.8%
40W–28L · 53.9% of games
7.5
48.2%
27W–29L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
162 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
80 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer