← Search

JILL ELKINS

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Leesburg, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 4W–15L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history19 matches
L
2026-10-29 · McDonald - Doubles and Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vanessa Moore
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-23 · McDonald - Doubles and Diamonds · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tami Rekas
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-21 · McDonald - Singles Society · #2 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-09 · McDonald - Doubles and Diamonds · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tamara Hurney
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-29 · McDonald - Singles Society · #3 Singles · 2.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-09-25 · McDonald - Doubles and Diamonds · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tami Rekas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · McDonald · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Faraji
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-13 · McDonald · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vanessa Moore
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-5
L
2025-10-15 · McDonald · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Courtney Pechie
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-26 · McDonald · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Ralston
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-12 · Sherry - Creighton Farms 2.5- Spring 2025 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shelli Burnham
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-13 · Creighton 2.5 Hurney · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Ralston
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
2.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match
#3 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova