← Search

Eugenia Viejobueno

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grapevine, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
295 matches · 225W–70L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history295 matches
L
2026-07-12 · RTC CURTIS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniella Bowling championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniella Bowling championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniella Bowling championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer-Junt W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer-Junt W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lee
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer-Junt W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · BIR PINE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelda Rusher championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-15 · BIR PINE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelda Rusher championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer-Junt W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniella Bowling
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · Wagon Wheel/Coffindaffer-Junt W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniella Bowling
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Steele Curtis championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · RTC CURTIS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Steele Curtis championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 62.5% of games
4.0
77.1%
168W–50L · 61.4% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.7% of games
7.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.5% of games
8.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 58.7% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
113 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
47 matches
Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe