← Search

Toni Sakai-Kawada

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hilo, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 52W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history161 matches
L
2026-04-25 · YOUNG AT HEART · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liane Martin
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · TEAM U-NICE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Meg Saunders
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · YOUNG AT HEART · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Liane Martin
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-28 · TEAM U-NICE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paige Nakano
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · Laugh Love Lob · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Yamaki
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-26 · Laugh Love Lob · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Yamaki
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · Young At Heart · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Harano-Hernandez
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Young At Heart · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terrie Ikehara
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-28 · Laugh Love Lob · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Yamaki
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-01-25 · Young At Heart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malia Wong
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-22 · TEAM U-NICE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darnella Villanueva
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-03 · TEAM U-NICE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paige Nakano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 55.5% of games
3.5
12.9%
4W–27L · 37.1% of games
6.0
29.4%
10W–24L · 41.7% of games
7.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
27.6%
8W–21L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer