← Search

Danielle Andrews

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CANDLER, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 97W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history165 matches
W
2026-10-27 · The Mind Readers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Palmer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-10-20 · The Mind Readers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Malt
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · WNCC Anders (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Malt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · WNCC Anders (ARC South) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Malt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-09 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susanna Saidi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · WNCA Hawes (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Hartye
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-24 · WNCC Anders (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristina Madarasz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriane Deeter
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Gillis
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Kinard
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Olesiuk
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 63.6% of games
3.5
54.8%
23W–19L · 50.3% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.5% of games
6.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 52.3% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–9L · 29.7% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams