← Search

Paula Loria

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Killingworth, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 43W–43L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alara Godbout
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · MAD: Mad Racquets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alara Godbout
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kruglak
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Mozzi
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Gladney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · MD: Mad Rackets: Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Mahon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Gladney
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-01-18 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Mahon
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-04 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maura Leone
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Mahon
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Mozzi
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
51.3%
39W–37L · 50.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams