← Search

Dan Ober

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lincoln, VT
3.5M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
9 matches · 2W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history9 matches
L
2026-02-22 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Piper Harrell mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Piper Harrell mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Saudade mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Spears mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-25 · MIT:Chavez/Potter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Saudade mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-12-07 · MIT:Chavez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Saudade mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-11-02 · MIT:Chavez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Spears mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2020-03-01 · MIT:Collas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Bark mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-02-23 · MIT:Collas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jude Melen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova