← Search

Patty Parrnelli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
284 matches · 169W–115L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history284 matches
W
2026-10-16 · ACP.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-12 · ACP.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Johnston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-01 · We.Sielaty55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Audrey Hollett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · ACP.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · We.Sielaty55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lora Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · TOC.Hollett · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Gelston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lora Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Hollett · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Fadelici
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Pa.Alford18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Sielaty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · ACP.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Stephens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · We.Sielaty55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Chabinsky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Sielaty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 64.4% of games
3.0
69.7%
83W–36L · 58.7% of games
3.5
45.6%
26W–31L · 45.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.8% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
54.2%
32W–27L · 52.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.3% of games
3.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.8% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
72 matches
#3 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams