← Search

Alexandra Foley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waco, TX
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 27W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-18 · Waco Woolies · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bankhead mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-28 · Waco Woolies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nathan Burson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Waco Woolies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Slone Early mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · Waco Woolies · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Xavier Lares mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-18 · Testroet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Raborn
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-18 · Testroet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Raborn
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Raborn
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Nina Escamilla Paradoski / Jennifer Wyble
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Patel
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Pruneda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Neeley Farnum / Daniel Trayler
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bankhead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bankhead mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Cody Stone / Linsy London
2024-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Pruneda mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe