← Search

Danica Camann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clarksboro, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 111W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history152 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Jersey Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Blum
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Fantastic Girls 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Cohen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · SOUTH/Grandest Slammers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meridith Bebee
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · Fantastic Girls 55+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackie Chew
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · Fantastic Girls 55+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackie Chew
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Jersey Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Blum
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · NJD/Jersey Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Morrone
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · SPRING SOUTH/Fierce Advantage · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Costa
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Jersey Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Costa
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · NJD/Jersey Hot Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne McAnally
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · Double Fierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Kramer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · SPRING SOUTH/Fierce Advantage · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Sontag
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.8% of games
3.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 60.1% of games
4.0
72.6%
61W–23L · 56.6% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer