Search

Dana Tinkey

Pittsburgh, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 6W–11L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Dana Tinkey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-07-19 · 40 Loves · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Pietrandrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · 40 Loves · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Guajardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Vuillemot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
L
Tina Zimmerman / Christine Andrews
2023-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Hromyak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Janet Klesic / Michele Zebra
2023-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 2-6
W
Elizabeth Franco / Gail Vater
2023-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Lisa Chan / Tina Zimmerman
2019-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert