← Search

William Marks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history25 matches
L
2025-08-27 · GOLDMAN TC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Evelyn Armstrong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
W
2024-05-22 · CALIFORNIA TC 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Elson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-0
L
2024-05-18 · CALIFORNIA TC 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Terris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-12 · CALIFORNIA TC 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Terris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-21 · CALIFORNIA TC 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Elson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-06-07 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-05-25 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-05-19 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-05-09 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-05-06 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-04-30 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-04-18 · OLYMPIC 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 71.9% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 39.5% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert