← Search

Tracee Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Smyrna, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 105W–52L · seasons 2016–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-03-10 · Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-03 · Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with LaTanya Davis
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 6-0
W
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wilson championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-24 · Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-18 · Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-17 · Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-04 · Heritage at Vinings (Katie Graham)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Wilson championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · Sewell Park (Stephanie King)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie McCorkle championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 2-6
L
2026-01-17 · Sewell Park (Stephanie King)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nkeiru Ojemaye-Abell
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-14 · Sugar Creek (Carolyn Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-13 · Heritage at Vinings (Katie Graham)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Becht
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.3% of games
3.5
77.1%
64W–19L · 60.8% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.9% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 77% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.5% of games
8.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe