← Search

Brent Fredrickson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 11W–19L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history30 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Peschel ES2027 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Henry Finch
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-10-19 · Peschel ES2027 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Peschel
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · Magistad: 18+ 4.0 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andre Hodder
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · Magistad: 18+ 4.0 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Kirchoff
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-05 · Magistad: 18+ 4.0 Summer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Kruse
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-18 · Magistad/Birkeland ES 26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amit Sharma
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-07-01 · Magistad: On the Rise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Peterson
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-10 · Magistad: On the Rise · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amit Sharma
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-20 · Magistad: On the Rise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Magistad
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-29 · Dymit · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Fredrickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
L
2022-07-15 · Dymit · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Fredrickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2022-06-17 · Dymit · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Fredrickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 62.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.1% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 27.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#1 Singles
17%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King