← Search

Teresa Ingram

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Colleyville, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 27W–45L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history72 matches
L
2026-01-02 · WAG MCCULLOUGH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Gallegos
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-19 · WAG MCCULLOUGH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Behar
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-12-12 · WAG MCCULLOUGH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Gallegos
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-01-31 · WAG MCCULLOUGH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Young Le
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-12-13 · WAG MCCULLOUGH · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Gallegos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-03 · Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Fisher
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-3
W
2024-11-01 · Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Odietus
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-21 · CCP EVANS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Isabel Domenech
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-04-07 · CCP EVANS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maritza Voth
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-11-10 · CCP EVANS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Evans
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-11-10 · CCP EVANS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Evans
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-10-14 · CCP EVANS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mesha Taylor
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 58.8% of games
4.5
19.4%
7W–29L · 38.3% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.4% of games
8.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal