← Search

Daryl Ingram

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HOOVER, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
505 matches · 306W–199L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history505 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Black
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Warner Huh championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Pouncey championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-20 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Davis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-14 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnny Clark
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendell Gibson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-24 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Dearing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elliott Taliaferro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Benson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 69.8% of games
3.0
84.6%
66W–12L · 63.9% of games
3.5
58.2%
149W–107L · 52.2% of games
4.0
25%
7W–21L · 42% of games
5.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 46.1% of games
6.5
62%
49W–30L · 53.4% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.1% of games
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
126 matches
#1 Singles
24%
120 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
104 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
93 matches
#2 Singles
10%
48 matches
Singles
2%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King