← Search

Kate Sisk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Middletown, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 21W–4L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-22 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Griffin championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Siegal
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenna Johnson
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenna Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Kelliher
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · RWU: Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 5-6
W
2025-07-09 · CC: Island Racket/Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Siegal
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-06-17 · CC: Island Racket/Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsty Morrison
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-02 · CC: Island Racket/Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angel MacLeod
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-05-10 · CC: Island Racket/Brown/Hook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenna Johnson
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 5-2
W
2024-08-19 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jemma Craig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-07-22 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jemma Craig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.1% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Singles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams