← Search

Pari Pham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 99W–113L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history212 matches
L
2026-10-28 · SILVER CREEK 55MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · SILVER CREEK 55MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Tomasello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-24 · SILVER CREEK 55MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Olson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-14 · SILVER CREEK CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Pacumio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-3
L
2026-09-03 · SILVER CREEK CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Pacumio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-12 · ALMADEN VAC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Viarengo
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · SILVER CREEK 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacie Pittenger
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · SILVER CREEK 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Cross
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-14 · SILVER CREEK 18AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacie Pittenger
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · ALMADEN VAC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Viarengo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · SILVER CREEK 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacie Pittenger
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-07 · VILLAGES GCC 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Varenkamp
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games
3.5
47.7%
31W–34L · 48.2% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 37.8% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.4% of games
6.0
100%
9W–0L · 70.4% of games
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 52% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 52% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
37.8%
17W–28L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer