← Search

Ashley White

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lavaca, AR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 115W–45L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history160 matches
W
2024-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Pillar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Adair mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dzung Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Killough
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Newby
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lora Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Geren
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Cox
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2024-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Cox
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-02-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Brooks
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-29 · Curtis/Grnwd/BG · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Morawski
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-07 · Curtis/Grnwd/BG · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Williams
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2023
Curtis/Grnwd/BG
2023 Fall into Winter Doubles · 3.0/3.5 Women
2023
Newby/VB/CM
2023 Fall into Winter Doubles · 3.5/4.0 Women
2023
Cunningham/FS/CM
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 18+
2022
Cunningham/FS/CM
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed · 18+
2022
Curtis-White/FS/CM
2022 Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women · 18+
2022
Edwards/FS/CM
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women · 18+
2022
White-Williams/FS/CM
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2022
White/FS/CM
2022 Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women · 18+
2022
White/LAV/BG
2022 Singles · 3.5 Women
2022
Young/Fayetteville/FAC
2022 Singles · 3.5 Women
2022
Curtis/FS/CM
2021 Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women · 18+
2021
DEUCES WILD/Oates/Russellville
2021 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5/3.0/2.5 Women · 18+
2021
Elshawnee/FS/CM
2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2021
Glover/FS/CM
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2021
Killough/FS/CM
2021 Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women · 18+
2021
Killough/FS/CM
2021 Interim 18 & Over · 3.75 Women · 18+
2021
Killough/FS/CM
2021 Interim 18 & Over · 4.25 Women · 18+
2021
Killough/FS/CM
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women · 18+
2021
Lyle/Van Buren/IND
2021 Adult Singles · 3.5 Women
2021
WATA - Huckelbury
2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed · 18+
2021
Killough/FS/FSAC
2020 Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women · 18+
2020
Lyle/VanBuren
2020 Adult Singles · 3.5 Women
2020
Glover-Taake/FS/FSAC
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2019
Glover/FS/CM
2019 Interim 18 & Over · 4.25 Women · 18+
2019
Glover/FS/CM
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women · 18+
2019
Glover/FS/CM
2019 Interim 18 & Over · 3.75 Women · 18+
2019
Menendez-Nordin/Fayetteville/FAC
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women · 18+
2019
White/ FSAC
2019 Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women · 18+
2019
White/FSAC
2019 Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women · 18+
2019
White/FSAC/FSM
2019 Adult Singles · 4.0 Women
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
3.5
76.2%
48W–15L · 60.3% of games
3.75
50%
4W–4L · 49.4% of games
4.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 52% of games
4.25
40%
2W–3L · 47.2% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.5% of games
6.5
80%
16W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.8% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#1 Singles
13%
21 matches
#2 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams