← Search

Harold Bitas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Union City, CA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
23 matches · 12W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history23 matches
W
2026-03-15 · UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gino Alimario
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Duke Dean
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-27 · UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Awais Zubair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-21 · UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danny Salamida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-31 · UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Duke Dean
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Lowe mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-08-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Audrey Schroeder mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Medina mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sophie de Saint Pierre mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Gee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Lowe mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sophie de Saint Pierre mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer