← Search

Tom Bond

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BREVARD, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 83W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history148 matches
W
2026-09-30 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Slatkow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-23 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Slatkow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Slatkow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charles Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bart Wailes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · WNCJ Marx (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mathis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · WNCJ Marx (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Lowery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
Default
2026-04-26 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Wailes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Grandis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Marx
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-29 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Handrahan
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · WNCG Handrahan (Connestee Falls) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Geist
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 42.7% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60.4%
32W–21L · 59% of games
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 34% of games
6.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.7% of games
7.5
60%
6W–4L · 44.7% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova