← Search

Diane Diedrich

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clovis, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
247 matches · 115W–132L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history247 matches
L
2026-10-26 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alyssa Marie R Chern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-24 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Carlson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-20 · FIG GARDEN CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Caruso
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-14 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Connie Vazquez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · FIG GARDEN CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Bilello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-23 · FIG GARDEN CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Sanders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-10 · FIG GARDEN 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leanne Monreal
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · FIG GARDEN 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Bilello
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-24 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ellis
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seng Leang Tang championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ellis
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 61% of games
4.0
40.8%
29W–42L · 45.8% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.2% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.5% of games
7.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 46.3% of games
8.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 49.5% of games
8.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 34.8% of games
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
77 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer