← Search

Lisa Schacher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mooresville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
338 matches · 188W–150L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history338 matches
L
2026-09-21 · LTAZ-Azamova/CRP 18s 7.5 Mon am · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shana Erber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-17 · LTAZ-Azamova/CRP 18s 7.5 Mon am · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patricia Arrowood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-3
L
2026-08-10 · LTAZ-Azamova/CRP 18s 7.5 Mon am · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamilla Azamova
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · TLABO - Bonham/LNRC Tri B 40+ Fri am · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Childers
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-05 · TLABO - Bonham/LNRC Tri B 40+ Fri am · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Childers
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/Edgemoor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gandy
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · TLKNO-Norcross-Brandon/LNRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Cedrone
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · TLKNO-Norcross-Brandon/LNRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Saxton
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · TLABO - Bonham/LNRC Tri B 40+ Fri am · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Riedell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/Edgemoor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Cedrone
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Anne Emlong championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melinda Urban championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.2%
23W–4L · 65.6% of games
3.5
61.2%
85W–54L · 55.6% of games
4.0
40.9%
27W–39L · 45.6% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 48.1% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
6.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.2% of games
7.5
40.9%
18W–26L · 47.5% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
103 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
82 matches
#2 Singles
6%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova