← Search

Lisa Finneral

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rye, NH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
442 matches · 278W–164L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history442 matches
L
2026-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barbara Bailey championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alessandra Herman championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barbara Bailey championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · SC:Finneral:Holmes · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Holmes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · SC:Finneral:Holmes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-27 · SC:Finneral:Holmes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lianne Cronin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-09-26 · Apex:MixFits:Haxhi · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Chadbourne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · Apex:MixFits:Haxhi · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Chadbourne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Holmes championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · NEW:Pinch an Inch:Bloom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Una Nimhurchu-Dennehy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams109 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76%
38W–12L · 63.1% of games
4.0
67.4%
97W–47L · 56.6% of games
4.5
49.1%
52W–54L · 49.1% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 57.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 69.8% of games
8.0mixed
51.1%
24W–23L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
223 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
72 matches
#1 Singles
10%
44 matches
#2 Singles
1%
6 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer