← Search

Anastassia Konnova

MESA, AZ
0.0 year-end
89 matches · 50W–39L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Anastassia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Anastassia is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Anastassia has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Anastassia has gone from the 76th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 54.6% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 36.2% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
L
2022-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tori Akman
−0.024below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tori Akman
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2021-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elim Zhang
+0.018better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elim Zhang
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Avani Vimawala / Monica Katzen
2021-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bree Olofson
+0.019better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Nancy Becherer / Tammy Myers
2021-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bree Olofson
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Marilyn Johnson / Jennifer Clemente
2021-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bree Olofson
+0.031better than expected — took 47% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Shan
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-02-27 · #3 Doubles · with Mark Mettler
−0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2021-02-26 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Mettler
−0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Rohit Sharma / Kristin Petersmixed
2020-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Mettler
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2020-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gundeep Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
1-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.