Search

Sanjiv Pandey

San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 66W–32L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
72%
stay 4.0
28%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.88. Lower than today’s 3.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 4.0
3 of 19

Sanjiv is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sanjiv has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Sanjiv has gone from the 48th to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 66% of games
4.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.1% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
Heather Wolfe / Adam Tomasimixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Xiaoyun Han
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Kartik Raina / Michal Bajdichchamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Cibi Pari
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Dan Su / Max Chengmixed
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Neiman
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mark Berlind / Christina Sembamixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Xiaoyun Han
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Susan Miller Hornbeek / Jonathan Hallmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Nam
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Howard Huang / Cheng-Shao Chiangchamps
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Cibi Pari
+0.020better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Jacob Loomis / Elaine Chongmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryam Sanaei
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Howard Huang / Cheng-Shao Chiang
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shuchun Zhao
0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Brian Hennessy / Christopher Perez
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikhil Prakash
0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Derek Lee / Peter Lowe
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Cannon
+0.002about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Mahesh Narayanan / Abhi Srivastva
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devank Agarwal
0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jimmy Le / Yiming Zhang
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bin Feng
+0.052better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.