← Search

Andrea Viso

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 115W–79L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history194 matches
L
2026-10-30 · Pizziol (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Waddell
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-26 · Ron Ehmann’s Renegades · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-23 · Pizziol (Salvadore Park) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doris Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-19 · Ron Ehmann’s Renegades · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine McManus
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · Pizziol (Salvadore Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-09 · Pizziol (Salvadore Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Ron Ehmann’s Renegades · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-21 · Ron Ehmann’s Renegades · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Eljuri
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-14 · Ron Ehmann’s Renegades · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Eljuri
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-28 · #4 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Maricarmen Diazmiron championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariola Idrobo championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-17 · Dante Fascell (Wilner) · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Maricarmen Diazmiron
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 66.9% of games
3.5
77.2%
61W–18L · 59.4% of games
4.0
35.6%
26W–47L · 44.4% of games
4.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.7% of games
7.5
80%
12W–3L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova