← Search

Chy Holman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NAPLES, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 7W–7L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history14 matches
L
2024-03-07 · Pelican Marsh - K.Victory · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kalli Kustas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-08 · Pelican Marsh - K.Victory · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Giannetti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-17 · Pelican Marsh - K.Victory · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marell Kowalski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-03-03 · Pelican Marsh - Holman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Albrite
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2023-02-24 · Pelican Marsh - Holman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Hecht
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-02-10 · Pelican Marsh - Holman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Albrite
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2023-01-27 · Pelican Marsh - Holman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Johnson-Salenko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2021-04-27 · Pelican Marsh - Bishop · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katrina Lundmark-Kash
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2021-04-06 · Pelican Marsh - Bishop · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with K VICTORY
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2021-03-25 · Pelican Marsh - Bishop · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katrina Lundmark-Kash
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2020-03-06 · Pelican Marsh - Luposello · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Stuckey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2020-02-21 · Pelican Marsh - Luposello · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Ferguson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer