← Search

Natasha Kloster

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Old Greenwich, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 166W–61L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history227 matches
L
2026-10-27 · GRC: 4.0 Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Lederer
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-3
W
2026-10-20 · Greenwich Racquet Club 4.0 Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Charette
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-6
W
2026-09-29 · Greenwich Racquet Club 4.0 Fall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Tomkiel
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susanna Nichols
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roge Nesbitt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Athan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Greenwich Racquet Club 40+ 4.0 W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Yeager
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-31 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Yeager
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-24 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Yeager
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deb Parnes
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-22 · GRC: 4.0 18 :Leon/Zaminski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvie Roisin
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-12-19 · GRC: 4.0 18 :Leon/Zaminski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Wells
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
79%
113W–30L · 62.4% of games
4.0
64.1%
50W–28L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
47 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe