Jan James-Calvert
Chicago, IL
151 matches · 50W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Jan James-Calvert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history151 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Samantha Garrity / Susan Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Amanda Baker / Carolyn Driscoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Marcia Florence / Rhonda Gumbel-Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
CDTA E 18&OW3.0 3MTC Brown2 Sun 2 $33.5
CDTA E 40&OW3.0 1MTC Brown1 Sun 6 $33.5
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 1MTC Brown Fri 7 $33.5
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 1MTC Brown Fri 7 $33.5
CDTA S 18&OW3.0 3.MTC Brown Sun 2 $33.5
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 5 $33.5
CDTA S 40&OW3.0 1.MTC Brown Sun 2 $33.5
CDTA W 18&OW3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sun 2 $33.5
CDTA W 40&OW3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sun 6 $33.5
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 49.1% of games
3.0
29.5%
31W–74L · 40.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 32.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.