← Search

Martin Fisher Jr

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PLEASANT HILL, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 92W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history166 matches
L
2026-11-01 · ClarkWilt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Studer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-25 · ClarkWilt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Korri ClarkWilt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-03 · Jha & Hanson: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravindran Perumal
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-27 · Buck/Fisher · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anil Jha
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · Buck/Fisher · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anil Jha
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · ClarkWilt · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Studer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-30 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Hanson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sudhish Madhavan championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-28 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Jha championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · IAWC/Buck-Fisher/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anil Jha championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · IAWC/Buck-Fisher/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Olsgaard championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · IAWC/Buck-Fisher/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stu Card championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 41.2% of games
3.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.6% of games
4.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 54.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
68%
17W–8L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
46.5%
20W–23L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer