← Search

Abid Majid

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 32W–34L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history66 matches
L
2025-06-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nayeem Shah
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Tak
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-04-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Patrick Forden
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Pintado
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2
W
2025-03-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Pintado
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-03-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chaitanya Mamdur
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-03-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muthubatcha Purushothaman
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-03-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Dusi
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-02-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chaitanya Mamdur
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chaitanya Mamdur
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-02-23 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Tak
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-01-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Patrick Forden
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 58.2% of games
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 43.7% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
10 matches
Singles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova