← Search

Sonda LLoyd

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 90W–167L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history257 matches
L
2026-09-30 · Baker/Garretson/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Lynch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-14 · Baker/Garretson/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deanna Garretson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Baker/Garretson/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Baker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Garretson/Stevens/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Garretson/Stevens/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Wenzler/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Garretson/Stevens/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · Wenzler/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Hart championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Summage-West championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Summage-West championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · Allison/Buck/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Robinson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
49.1%
27W–28L · 51.4% of games
2.75
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.1% of games
3.0
25.6%
23W–67L · 38.1% of games
3.25
14.3%
1W–6L · 27.4% of games
5.5
48%
12W–13L · 45.2% of games
6.5
0%
0W–10L · 27.4% of games
2.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66% of games
3.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
14W–21L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
43 matches
#3 Singles
5%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer