Search

Troy Rabenstein

Bradenton, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
72 matches · 39W–33L · seasons 20222024
Where Troy sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Troy is one of 1278 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 60% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Troy has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Troy has gone from the 85th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 58.1% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 45.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 46.7% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
W
Albert Ferguson / Edward Flores
2024-02-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Roger Martinez / Derrick Hunter
2024-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Jones
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Chachi Kruel / Brian Wylie
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Selinger
+0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Getnet Fikre / Mike Stratton
2024-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
+0.076better than expected — took 100% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
0.042below expectation — took 56% of games against 66% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-11-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
0.065below expectation — took 32% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Ryan Selinger / Joseph Gong
2023-11-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Moses
+0.025better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Isaac Martin / Phil Pham
2023-10-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Tyler Gaston / Joel Willis
2023-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Bruce Robertson / Pallavi Marulasiddappachamps
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Sullivan
+0.029about as expected — took 32% of games against 28% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Tam Vu / Jamie DeLongchamps
2023-10-13 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Bucquet
0.028below expectation — took 58% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.