← Search

Michael Hannigan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Paxton, MA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 6W–11L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-03-20 · NETC:New EnglandTC: Pellakuru · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-23 · NETC:New EnglandTC: Pellakuru · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-01-09 · NETC:New EnglandTC: Pellakuru · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-05-13 · PAX:Paxton Blue:Hannigan/Cortazio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Rogers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-15 · PAX:Paxton Blue:Hannigan/Cortazio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-04-03 · PAX:Paxton Blue:Hannigan/Cortazio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-18 · PAX:Paxton Blue:Hannigan/Cortazio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aibhlin Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-02-18 · PAX:Paxton Blue:Hannigan/Cortazio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Phan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2021-01-10 · PAX:Paxton Blue:O'Connor · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2020-11-13 · PAX:Paxton Blue:O'Connor · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Obrien mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2020-10-30 · PAX:Paxton Blue:O'Connor · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2020-08-30 · PAX;Paxton;O'Connor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Hannigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer