← Search

Jim Bridges

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Prosper, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 4W–5L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history9 matches
L
2025-03-02 · McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Doe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-02-23 · McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Megert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-17 · McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Paparella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-02 · McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Jett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-03 · McKinney/Megert-Fletcher M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Paparella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2019-06-16 · McKinney/Fletcher M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Layne Fletcher
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2019-05-19 · McKinney/Fletcher M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Megert
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2019-04-14 · McKinney/Fletcher M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fred Hammond
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2018-09-16 · McKinney/Fletcher M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Warren Dekinder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams