← Search

James Rhee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newton, MA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
8 matches · 1W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history8 matches
L
2026-02-20 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-04-25 · WIG:Wightman:Burnett · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Kenney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-03 · WIG:Wightman:Burnett · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Kenney mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-02-23 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney/Kenney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-04-19 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-04-05 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2019-03-01 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2019-01-25 · WIG:Wightman:Kenney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer