← Search

JEFFREY DEACON

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New London, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history53 matches
W
2026-03-21 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Zeller
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Junius
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · NPT:Deacon:Matthews · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Mountford
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Paul
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-12 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Dunn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-05 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Junius
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-03-22 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Al Matthews
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-11 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Al Matthews
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-04 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Truax
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-09 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Paul
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-03 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-10-26 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Junius
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
29%
9W–22L · 40.4% of games
7.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer