← Search

Alisha Rohlwing

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 75W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Behnke-Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelley Herr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-15 · Behnke-Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brittany Lederer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-25 · Behnke-Hulliberger/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura McDougall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alida Fitzpatrick
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Palladino
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Phillips championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Behnke championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Phillips championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois Chun
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois Chun
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-22 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois Chun
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
52%
13W–12L · 51% of games
2.75
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.9% of games
3.0
36.1%
30W–53L · 44.3% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.9% of games
5.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.8% of games
6.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 28.8% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert