← Search

Tanya Haggard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chandler, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 175W–91L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history266 matches
L
2026-10-21 · 4.0 IOTC1 Clubb W40F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Clubb
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-14 · 4.0 IOTC1 Clubb W40F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valorie Martin
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · 4.0 OCO1 Barutha/Morris W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valorie Martin
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · 4.0 OCO1 Barutha/Morris W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ebony Hodges
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · 4.0 ??? Nelson W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valorie Martin
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-11 · 4.0 ??? Nelson W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valorie Martin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-28 · 4.0 ??? Nelson W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valorie Martin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-31 · 4.0 OCO BellMorris W18Fam · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Crump
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · 4.0 OCO BellMorris W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephani Schaefer
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-10 · 4.0 OCO BellMorris W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Clubb
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-07 · 4.0 IOTC Clubb W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dori Lynch
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-10-03 · 4.0 OCO BellMorris W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephani Schaefer
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 71.9% of games
4.0
63.5%
129W–74L · 55.1% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.7% of games
8.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
152 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams